Stablecoins vs. fiat: what’s better for global transactions?

Discover how stablecoins are transforming cross-border payments, and what sets them apart from traditional currencies.

As digital currencies evolve and the demand for faster, cheaper cross-border payments grows, stablecoins have entered the spotlight. Designed to combine the benefits of cryptocurrency with the stability of fiat, stablecoins are increasingly being considered as an alternative to traditional payment methods in international transactions. But how do they really compare? And why use stablecoins instead of fiat?

This article explores the strengths and limitations of each, as well as where they fit into the future of global finance.

What are stablecoins?

Stablecoins are a class of digital currencies designed to maintain a stable value by pegging their price to a reserve asset. Typically, that asset is a fiat currency such as the US dollar or euro, but it can also include commodities or other cryptocurrencies. Their main goal is to offer the benefits of blockchain-based transactions, such as speed, transparency, and low fees, without the volatility seen in assets like Bitcoin or Ethereum.

So, what are payment stablecoins? Payment stablecoins are specifically designed for transactional use, allowing businesses and individuals to send and receive value in a digital form that mimics fiat without going through traditional banks. USDC, and DAI are among the most widely used in this space.

What are the major stablecoins, and how are they used?

Several stablecoins have gained prominence in recent years. Examples of the most recognised major stable coins include:

• USDC (USD Coin), issued by Circle, widely used in enterprise and institutional contexts
• DAI, a decentralised stablecoin backed by crypto collateral
• BUSD, launched by Binance and backed 1:1 by USD reserves

Together, these represent the backbone of many crypto payment systems and serve as a crucial part of decentralised finance (DeFi) platforms. When businesses explore digital currencies, they often start by asking, can you pay with stablecoins? The answer is yes, and increasingly, stablecoins are being integrated into wallets, payment platforms, and even traditional finance interfaces to enable near-instant, borderless value transfer.

What are the 4 types of stablecoins?

To understand their differences, it helps to break stablecoins down into four types:

1. Fiat-collateralised stablecoins — backed by traditional currency reserves (e.g., USDC)
2. Crypto-collateralised stablecoins — backed by other cryptocurrencies (e.g., DAI)
3. Commodity-backed stablecoins — pegged to assets like gold (e.g., PAX Gold)
4. Algorithmic stablecoins — use code and smart contracts to manage supply and maintain price stability (e.g., UST, though now largely discredited)

Each of these four types of stablecoins carry trade-offs in terms of transparency, stability, and trust. Businesses need to weigh these when deciding whether to hold, send, or accept stablecoins in a commercial setting.

How are stablecoins different from traditional assets?

The key distinction lies in speed, cost, and accessibility. How are stablecoins different from traditional assets? Traditional fiat relies on legacy banking systems, often restricted by geography, business hours, and intermediaries. In contrast, stablecoins operate 24/7 on blockchain networks, allowing money to move in seconds, not days, with minimal fees.

Unlike holding a bank balance, stablecoin transactions do not require clearinghouses or SWIFT messaging. For global businesses, this can significantly reduce overhead and accelerate cash flow.

Why use stablecoins instead of fiat?

There are several strategic reasons why businesses use stablecoins instead of fiat, particularly in cross-border contexts. First, they eliminate intermediaries, enabling faster settlement at lower cost. Second, they provide an on-ramp to digital ecosystems like DeFi or tokenised finance. Third, stablecoins are especially useful in regions where access to USD or euros is limited but demand is high.

However, stablecoins are not without limitations. Regulatory uncertainty, counterparty risk, and limited banking integrations still present challenges for enterprises that operate at scale.

That said, many businesses are now experimenting with stablecoins as a working capital solution, using them for vendor payments, treasury management, or even payroll. Their programmability also opens doors for automated payments and smart contract integration.

Stablecoins vs. fiat: which is better?

So, which is better for global transactions, stablecoins or fiat? The answer depends on your specific goals and operational needs.

For businesses requiring regulatory clarity, broad merchant acceptance, and access to global banking networks, fiat remains essential. But for those seeking speed, efficiency, and programmability, stablecoins offer a compelling alternative. In many cases, the ideal model lies in a hybrid approach, using stablecoins for intra-network transactions and fiat for local settlement.

As infrastructure improves and regulation catches up, stablecoins could become a standard payment rail alongside traditional systems. The ability to pay with stablecoins, settle quickly, and tap into decentralised finance gives forward-thinking businesses an edge.

Stablecoins in the future of payments

Stablecoins represent one of the most promising tools for modernising cross-border transactions. By combining the utility of digital assets with the reliability of fiat value, they are already reshaping how businesses think about moving money internationally. As regulation evolves and adoption expands, stablecoins are positioned to play a significant role in global payment infrastructure, not as a replacement for fiat, but as a flexible complement to it.

For businesses looking to reduce costs, improve settlement speed, or tap into digital ecosystems, stablecoins offer a compelling way forward.